Fuji TV: It was reported the Japanese government assessed that the balloon flying over Japan in January 2022 comes from China. Can the Chinese side confirm it and do you have any comment?
Wang Wenbin: We noted the reports. We would like to stress that Japan needs to be objective and impartial on this instead of following the US’s suit in dramatizing it.
Reuters: Earlier you said that the US balloons flew over Chinese airspace over ten times since 2022. White House National Security Spokesperson John Kirby had said that he is not aware of any US aircraft in Chinese airspace. How would you explain the discrepancy in the narratives by both sides?
Wang Wenbin: We explained the situation yesterday and we have noted that the US did not categorically deny this.
AFP: You said yesterday that US high-altitude balloons have illegally flown over China’s airspace without approval from relevant Chinese authorities over ten times since last year. Do you have any evidence?
Wang Wenbin: We have shared the information. Since you asked, I would like to add some related facts.
Since last year, more specifically since May last year, the US has released multiple high-altitude balloons from its territory, which have continuously circled the globe and flown over the airspace of China and several dozen other countries over ten times illegally at least without the approval of relevant Chinese authorities. The US needs to fully look into this and give China an explanation.
The Wall Street Journal: Is there any more information you could provide in terms of what altitude the US balloons were allegedly flying at? And specifically where were they flying?
Wang Wenbin: I have just stated our position. Your question is more suited to the US side, who needs to give us an explanation about it.
TASS: NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said yesterday that the unidentified balloons above the US is a sign of Russia and China ramping up their intelligence activities against NATO countries. Do you have any comment on this?
Wang Wenbin: We have made our position clear on the unintended entry of the unmanned Chinese civilian airship into US airspace, which was an unexpected and isolated event. NATO’s remarks are nothing but nefarious speculation against China. We urge NATO to stop groundlessly accusing China, stop creating imagined enemies and pushing the boundaries and act in the interest of world peace and stability.
Speaking of surveillance, the US is no doubt the number one country in the world. Europe and many other countries can certainly tell from their own experience. Danish media reported that the US National Security Agency (NSA), while partnering with Denmark’s foreign intelligence unit, spied on leaders of Germany, Sweden, Norway and France, including former German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Since 1970s, the CIA has secretly rigged Crypto AG, a Swiss manufacturer of encryption machines to eavesdrop on countries around the globe. The rigged encryption devices sold to over 120 countries were in fact used by CIA to eavesdrop on secret communications. According to a report released by the Beijing-based Qi An Pangu lab, Equation, the hacking group under the NSA, has been creating a top-of-the-line backdoor and conducting a decade-long cyber attack operation called “Telescreen” against 45 countries and regions, including China, Russia, the UK, Germany and the Netherlands. The operation covers communications, research institutions, and economic and military sectors.
According to POLITICO, the Pentagon has spent billions of dollars in developing high-altitude reconnaissance balloons since 1997. The Pentagon quietly transitioned the balloon projects to the military services in 2022, which may be used to track hypersonic strategic cruise missiles being developed by China and Russia.
I hope that as journalists, you will look harder into this and find out how many more secrets are there behind these US eavesdropping and spying activities.
Bloomberg: It was reported that US Secretary of State Antony Blinken is considering a meeting with China’s Wang Yi at the Munich Security Conference. Can the foreign ministry confirm this?
Wang Wenbin: I don’t have anything to offer.
Bloomberg: We want to know whether Chinese diplomats and state media outlets are trying to distract public attention from the balloon incident by raising questions around US involvement in the Nord Stream pipeline blast as well as the chemical spill from the train derailment?
Wang Wenbin: The Nord Stream gas pipelines are vital transnational infrastructure. The explosions have had a serious impact on the global energy market and ecological environment. If Seymour Hersh, a well-known US investigative journalist, is telling the truth about US involvement in the explosions, what he revealed is clearly unacceptable and must be answered for. The US owes the world a responsible explanation.
We wonder why there is little coverage by some media hailed as free, professional and impartial on the latest investigative report on the bombing of the Nord Stream gas pipelines and the chemical leak caused by the train derailment in the US? Based on what we have seen, this is nothing new.
Reuters: Earlier you said the US shooting down of the Chinese balloon was irresponsible. Can we then understand that because you also said that China’s handling of the US balloons was responsible and professional that you were actually saying that China did not shoot the US balloons?
Wang Wenbin: We have said time and again that the US clearly overreacted by using force on an unmanned Chinese civilian airship. Quite a few media outlets have compared the US’s downing of the flying objects to shooting mosquitoes with flak guns and called it “odd and costly political behavior art”. The US needs to be careful not to pull its muscle while flexing it so hard.
Reuters: We know that you have said earlier that you have no further evidence to offer about the balloons that you said are from the US. Could you tell us how do you then know that these balloons belong to the US?
Wang Wenbin: I just shared additional information with you. I would suggest that you ask the US side to verify this.